nebris: (Desert Wall)
"What happens after a person jumps off the Golden Gate Bridge but Survives? Typically, they undergo a permanent spiritual transformation! So now I'm thinking, is there any way to create this effect without such a high chance of dying? What if we could do it with a low but still significant chance of dying? Would it be worth it? Many tribal cultures put everyone through a dangerous ritual before becoming an adult. Our own culture is terrified of physical injury or death, to the point of being puritanical. Eventually we might understand that when the death rate gets too low, survival becomes inversely correlated with quality of life, and we need culturally acceptable ways to face real danger." ~Ran Prieur
nebris: (A Proper General)
Via Defense and Freedom Blog

It's "on and off and on again" interesting to me to look at and think about developing countries' (para)military forces. I mean countries such as in West or East Africa, not partially modern countries such as Brazil, India or oil countries.

The typical developing country has few benefits from its military. It's way too often rather a threat to political stability and usually overstretched once an actual armed conflict arises.

Border conflicts and all-out interstate warfare are rather rare. The most typical form of warfare is against an armed insurrection by a minority or against paramilitary forces infiltrating from a neighbouring country at war.

An article about the rebuilding (from scratch!) of the army of civil war-torn Liberia caught my interest a while ago and points in my opinion at the most important aspect: It's all about the personnel.

You don't need much equipment for a typical developing countries' military, especially not heavy equipment. Some cheap NORINCO small arms, mortars and RPGs plus a few patrol boats, some trucks and pickups, tents, some fatigues and boots plus a useful radio equipment are about all that it takes.

All else is a question of personnel (competence and motivation).

First of all, the personnel should not have a murderous (civil) war background or be suspected of corruption.

Second, it should be properly trained, properly cared for and loyal to the law.

Third, it shouldn't be some conscript force but rather a cadre force in order to enable a quick force expansion in times of crisis.

I would begin by setting up an academy for gendarmerie training (half year basic gendarmerie course). Indeed, I wouldn't set up a military at all, but only a gendarmerie (semi-police, semi-military institution).

This gendarmerie would be the only representative of the central government's privilege of the use of force.

The other police institutions could be locally elected sheriffs, and of course this aims at empowering the populace to get rid of corrupt local police through elections.

Parliament and government institutions can run their own compound security service and high-ranking officials can get a driver-bodyguard - but these would be restricted to handguns and a purely defensive employment of the same.


The gendarmerie would

(1) enforce lawfulness of local police forces (investigation and arrest, protecting local elections)
(2) guard the borders, serve as customs agency
(3) guard wildlife sanctuaries
(4) control resource usage (detect and investigate illegal wood harvesting, fishing, mining, pollution etc)
(5) prepare as cadre force for warfare
(6) serve as coast guard, including search and rescue
(7) provide basic airport policing and investigate illegal flights based on reports of civilian air traffic controllers
(9) serve as national police reserve, for example for securing large public events
(10) run its own academy
(11) guard prisons and watch prisoner labour groups (and as such oversee some construction projects)
(12) accompany anti-corruption officials as enforcers
(13) guard embassies
(14) serve as basic intelligence agency for observation of armed forces in neighbouring countries
(15) serve as basic counter-intelligence agency, mostly for providing basic security for critical government institutions (foreign ministry, ministry of gendarmerie, head of government office)

The seeming jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none approach is probably necessary to give the forces a good utility in peacetime. It helps furthermore to keep the gendarmerie fragmented and with near-permanent personnel turnover even in leadership positions: These would be very difficult conditions for a coup d'état planner.

The personnel would rotate irregularly, leaving enough experienced personnel in one function, but infuse new personnel as well. This near-constant movement of personnel (average duration on a specialty about 1-3 years in a row after 1 month training) should make it more difficult for individual units to get on a wrong track.

The defence itself could be based on a motorised infantry + local guided militia approach. Small teams of gendarmerie would train and lead village or local militias while gendarmerie with quickly trained enlisted volunteers would strive for a quick end in an interstate conflict through small unit and unit competence and small formation manoeuvre. Meanwhile, other quickly trained enlisted volunteers would reinforce the gendarmerie in its civilian functions. These volunteers would sign up for a two-year period, possibly extend for one ear each or get accepted into the academy for full gendarmerie training after the first two years. The motivation would come from decent pay and a bonus for later applications for government jobs or for access to higher education. Real gendarms would work for pay that's enough for a family and a pension that's enough for a household of two.

The academy would be the one central piece, and its leadership has to be selected carefully, for the academy leadership is probably the only part of the gendarmerie that would be able to pull off a coup d'état. It would thus be very restricted in terms of available weapons and ammunition. The academy could also serve as the institution's symbol and pride.

I would separate it into basic training, advanced (officer) training and specialisation training - three months, three months and one month respectively.

Developing country military affairs may lack pseudo-sexy fighters, tanks and aircraft carriers - but they add some facets to the topic of personnel. We (in the "West") don't regularly think of a military as a force to be kept in check for it could otherwise attempt a coup d'état, do we?
nebris: (The Temple 2)
"Perhaps the most common theme in Human history is that what is first thought of as ridiculous almost always become ubiquitous, a Lesson which we shall in due course Teach The World about our New Matriarchy."
nebris: (FemJihad)
"We will separately incorporate a security company that will have two primary purposes: One, provide physical security for The Temple's various locations and for our affiliated organizations, and Two, operate an investigative arm that will do background checks, etc, and provide security on a more subtle level." From Her Prophet Explains: Part Four - "The Temple's Tactical Initiatives" ..and some of them may very well be former members of the Mexican Marines..


Click to Enlarge
nebris: (A Manga Thang)
From io9

We've just learned that
there's strong evidence that saltwater flows on the surface of Mars. It's another reminder that water is everywhere in our solar system, whether it's ice, vapor, or liquid. Here's a handy guide to where all the water can be found.

Our map is mainly focused on the places where we might find liquid water. There's a simple reason for that: Water molecules are incredibly bountiful throughout our solar system. Pretty much anywhere that there's an atmosphere, there's water vapor in it, and a huge percentage of the rocks in our solar system contain some amount of ice. So let's instead examine where conditions are just right for liquid water to exist.

There's only one body in the solar system where we have indisputable evidence that there's liquid water on the surface - that, of course, would be Earth, although it now looks like Mars is the second, albeit on a much, much smaller scale. Going back billions of years, there's good evidence to think that Venus and Mars both supported large, Earth-like bodies of water, before changing climates made one too hot and the other too cold to support them any longer.

Most other rocky objects have ice on the surface. Just in the inner solar system, that includes the Moon, Mars, and Mercury. It's when you dive deep into the crust that you find large, subterranean oceans of liquid water. Pretty much all the various moons on this map, along with Kuiper Belt objects like Pluto, are thought to have oceans hidden roughly 100 kilometers beneath their icy crusts.

Now, most of these oceans remain hypothetical - the one we're closest to certain about is Jupiter's moon Europa. But even that ocean's existence isn't absolutely definite — we only have indirect evidence. If they exist, these lunar oceans are maintained by various internal heating processes, particularly radioactive decay within the satellites' cores. Again, if we go back far enough, it's possible that the icy exteriors of some of these bodies were once watery too, but they've long since fallen into an eternal freeze.

The one wild card in all this is Saturn's moon Enceladus. The moon ejects water out of geysers and cryovolcanoes, although it's unclear what precise form this water is in. There's some evidence that the cryovolcanoes are ejecting liquid water, but it's possible that only vapor and ice are making their way to the surface. Whatever the case, the presence of these formations is a strong indicator that there's liquid water, and likely much nearer to the surface than on other satellites - perhaps as little as ten kilometers down.

The gas giants are an interesting case. Obviously, we're not really talking about oceans in the same way that we would on rocky objects, but there is evidence that liquid water can be found, after a fashion, on three of our solar system's four giants. (Saturn has plenty of ice and water vapor, but probably nothing liquid.) Jupiter is so massive and composed of so many layers that one might happen to closely resemble that of Earth's atmosphere, and the similar temperature and pressure could allow for the short-term condensation of liquid droplets. I'm not sure that's enough to say it's raining on Jupiter, but it's an intriguing thought.

A map of all the water in the solar system Here's a handy, expandable version of the map.

Then there are Neptune and Uranus. There's a solid argument that it's a misnomer to call these planets gas giants - a more accurate term for them would be ice giants. Uranus and Neptune are mostly made of water, ammonia, and methane, all of which freeze far more readily than the hydrogen and helium gases that make up most of Jupiter and Saturn. While we still don't know a whole lot for certain about the ice giants' composition, it's thought that their middle layers might actually be vast water-ammonia oceans. This would be unlike any body of water we've ever seen, as the tremendous pressures involved would make the water incredibly hot and unimaginably dense, not to mention highly electrically conductive.

That takes care of the planets and satellites. Let's finish up by taking a look at the comets and asteroids. Comets are relatively well-known for their high ice content, but some recent studies on comet dust indicate that they contained liquid water at some point in the distant past. As for the asteroid belt, some but by no means all of the rocks formed with ice inside, but there isn't much evidence of liquid water there. The one huge exception is the belt's lone dwarf planet Ceres, which might contain a water-ammonia ocean beneath its icy exterior.

So where does this leave us? Will we be able to mine the solar system for all the water we'll ever need? Could there be life hiding deep beneath the surface of just about ever moon in the solar system? Honestly, we don't have definitive answers to these questions yet. We have very good reason to believe that water is a hugely plentiful resource, and even that liquid water can be found throughout the solar system if we're willing to look hard enough. But precisely how much use all this water could be in human space exploration, or how likely any of this is to be home to extraterrestrial life, however simple, is still very much an open question.

nebris: (FemJihad)
By Laura Rozen | The Envoy – 18 hrs ago

As Norway continues to grapple with the attacks by a home-grown extremist that killed 77 people last month, one couple, who moved to help young people fleeing from gunman Anders Breivik, is getting a bit of belated recognition.

Hege Dalen and her wife, Toril Hansen, were eating dinner on July 22nd on the other shore from Utoya island when they heard screaming, the Finnish newspaper Helsingin Sannomat reported. After bombing government buildings in Oslo, Breivik had come to the island dressed as a policeman and went on to shoot more than 100 young people attending a Labour party camp there.

"We were eating," Dalen told the newspaper. "Then shooting and then the awful screaming. We saw how the young people ran in panic into the lake."

The couple took off in their boat for the island, picking up shocked victims from the water and transporting them to the mainland. They made four runs in all, helping rescue some 40 of Breivik's victims, the paper reported.

"Between runs they saw that the bullets had hit the right side of the boat," the paper wrote.

Some lesbian-gay news sites and blogs have picked up the account in recent days, noting the same-sex married heroes of the story haven't gotten much attention in the Western press.

Profile

nebris: (Default)
The Divine Mr. M

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 3 456 7
8 9 1011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags