![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
nebris"By linking Julian Assange and Dominique Strauss-Khan here as 'rape deniers' you are doing the work of The Global Corporate State, which is certainly no friend of women or of most humans in general. They are using the pain and suffering of actual rape victims as weapons to attack a political enemy.
Dominique Strauss-Khan is a member of The Ruling Class and almost certainly serial rapist. That is fairly clear.
Julian Assange is an Enemy of The Ruling Class and, at worst, a 'womanizer'. That could be a product of his ego. It could also be a result of knowing that what he does is going to get him killed. But womanizing is not rape.
But The Powers That Be know full that even a specious rape charge could fatally wound him.
If you think I'm making excuses for Assange, let's look at his situation compared to DSK.
The 'charges' against Assange are for 'not using a condom' during a consensual sexual act or for not revealing that a condom broke. The details are somewhat vague at this point. The 'charges' were filed days later, then withdrawn, then sort of reinstated. In fact, he is not now formally charged with anything, merely 'wanted for questioning'.
DSK was clearly and directly accused of forcible oral rape and was apprehended trying to flee the jurisdiction within hours of the act
Assange has been under house arrest in the UK for over eight months now, without any formal charges being made and with neither complainant every saying consent was ever removed.
DSK was released, charges dropped, after three months, even with another woman coming forward to claim he attempted to rape her. Not some 'immigrant maid' who can be crushed in the media [or a political groupie who can be pressured into false statements], but the daughter of a powerful member of his own party.
Yet DSK is as free as a lark, while Assange is still confined and under daily attack.
And you have just become part of that attack. I'm neither blaming not shaming you for that. Rape denial has a long and pernicious history. And The Powers That Be are using that double edged sword in an attempt to destroy someone who is really your ally, even if you may not like him personally.
All I am asking is that you rigorously re-examine both the facts and the context.
Speaking of 'context', I note that while DSK is largely forgotten upon these shores, Casey Anthony is still America's Most Hated. I think that says a lot about our sexual landscape." ...comment on Ten shades of "false rape accusations."
Dominique Strauss-Khan is a member of The Ruling Class and almost certainly serial rapist. That is fairly clear.
Julian Assange is an Enemy of The Ruling Class and, at worst, a 'womanizer'. That could be a product of his ego. It could also be a result of knowing that what he does is going to get him killed. But womanizing is not rape.
But The Powers That Be know full that even a specious rape charge could fatally wound him.
If you think I'm making excuses for Assange, let's look at his situation compared to DSK.
The 'charges' against Assange are for 'not using a condom' during a consensual sexual act or for not revealing that a condom broke. The details are somewhat vague at this point. The 'charges' were filed days later, then withdrawn, then sort of reinstated. In fact, he is not now formally charged with anything, merely 'wanted for questioning'.
DSK was clearly and directly accused of forcible oral rape and was apprehended trying to flee the jurisdiction within hours of the act
Assange has been under house arrest in the UK for over eight months now, without any formal charges being made and with neither complainant every saying consent was ever removed.
DSK was released, charges dropped, after three months, even with another woman coming forward to claim he attempted to rape her. Not some 'immigrant maid' who can be crushed in the media [or a political groupie who can be pressured into false statements], but the daughter of a powerful member of his own party.
Yet DSK is as free as a lark, while Assange is still confined and under daily attack.
And you have just become part of that attack. I'm neither blaming not shaming you for that. Rape denial has a long and pernicious history. And The Powers That Be are using that double edged sword in an attempt to destroy someone who is really your ally, even if you may not like him personally.
All I am asking is that you rigorously re-examine both the facts and the context.
Speaking of 'context', I note that while DSK is largely forgotten upon these shores, Casey Anthony is still America's Most Hated. I think that says a lot about our sexual landscape." ...comment on Ten shades of "false rape accusations."
